Bloom v. Brotherhood Accident Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Linn, J.,
The plaintiffs, children of Barnett Bloom, deceased, have judgment on a verdict in their suit on an accident and health insurance policy issued by defendant, who complains that judgment n. o. v. was refused. While that is the single error assigned, defendant asserts that the court below misconstrued the policy in three respects, and that a correct interpretation of any one of them will require a reversal.
Decedent was insured “against personal bodily injuries received through external, violent and accidental means, leaving upon the body external marks of contusions or wounds…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Paul v. . Travelers' Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Lane v. Horn & Hardart Baking Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
- McGlinchey v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1888
- Christ v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1924
- Pickett v. Pacific M. L. Ins., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Warren County1891
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Beckham v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Urian v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Beckham v. Travelers InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- The Beryllium Corporation v. American Mutual Liability Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
- Andrzejewski v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.