Legal Opinion

Doody v. PENGUIN GROUP (USA) INC.

District Court, D. Hawaii

Decided November 23, 2009No. Civil 08-00285 JMS/BMKPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

In 2003, Plaintiff Louis Doody (“Plaintiff’) sent a manuscript of his copyrighted fictional novel Gold of the Khan to Defendant Penguin Group (USA) Inc. (“Penguin”) for its consideration. The manuscript tells the story of a Boston history professor, Marya Bradwell, who searches for and finds Marco Polo’s lost treasure hidden in a church in Croatia. Penguin ultimately rejected Plaintiffs manuscript, but Plaintiff contends that protected elements of his manuscript were copied and…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Soremekun v. Thrifty Payless, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Northwest Home Designing Inc. v. Sound Built Homes Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2011
  2. Clinton v. PollardDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2024
  3. OEG Inc v. KorumDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2025
  4. Yellowcake, Inc. v. Hyphy Music, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2021
  5. Yellowcake, Inc. v. Morena Music, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API