Legal Opinion

Fletcher Paper Co. v. City of Alpena

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1912No. Docket No. 101PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to Alpena; Emerick, J. Assumpsit by the Fletcher Paper Company against the city of Alpena for the recovery of taxes paid under protest. A judgment for defendant on a verdict directed by the court is reviewed by plaintiff on writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

This is an action of assumpsit to recover from the defendant a judgment for a portion of the taxes assessed against the plaintiff’s property, and which it paid involuntarily in the city of Alpena for the year 1910, because and for the alleged reason that the real property of the Huron Portland Cement Company was, by the assessing officer of the city, and the board of review, assessed at the sum of $150,000, whereas the fair cash value of said property was $1,250,000; it being the claim of the plain*36tiff that there was a wilful and intentional undervaluation and assessment of the real property…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Peninsula Iron & Lumber Co. v. Township of Crystal FallsMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Williams v. City of SaginawMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  3. First National Bank v. Township of St. JosephMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Township of Caledonia v. RoseMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Comstock v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1884

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hutson v. City of Royal OakMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  2. Auditor General v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  3. W. & E. Burnside, Inc. v. Bangor TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Auditor General v. JohnsMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Imerman Screw Products Co. v. City of HamtramckMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API