In re the Marriage of Winkler
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.
Husband appeals from a judgment of dissolution of marriage and assigns error to the trial court’s property division. Wife cross-appeals from the dissolution judgment and a supplemental judgment denying her request for attorney fees. On de novo review, ORS 19.415(3),1 we affirm on the appeal and cross-appeal.
Both husband and wife come from wealthy families, which provided each of them with sufficient assets that neither was required to work, nor will either be required to work, in order to support themselves or their children.2 The parties met in Indiana and were married there in 1986. Husband…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- In Re Marriage of KunzeOregon Supreme Court · 2004
- Matter of Marriage of JenksOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Matter of Marriage of MasseeOregon Supreme Court · 1999
- In re the Marriage of FrishkoffCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- In re the Marriage of PullenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re the Marriage of OlsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- In Re the Marriage of WolfeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- In re the Marriage of Gano-RidgeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007