Chisholm v. UHP Projects, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1DissentKing, Circuit Judge
On July 1, 1994, Ultra High Pressure Projects,- Incorporated (“UHP”), breached its duty to provide workmanlike performance on board the ULTRAMAX, and this breach was the proximate cause of Mr. Chisholm’s severe injuries. As such, UHP is, under any modern definition of the term, a “tortfeasor.” Because well-established legal principles do not permit such tortfeasors to offset tort damage awards with payments the plaintiff receives from a collateral source, UHP should be required to pay, in its entirety, the tort award fixed against UHP at trial. Therefore, I would reverse the district court’s…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. Pan-Atlantic Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- McDermott, Inc. v. AmClydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Waterman Steamship Corp. v. Dugan & McNamara, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Eric Clausen v. Sea-3, Inc., Storage Tank Development CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- United States v. William H. Price, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1961
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.