Legal Opinion

Joseph T. Ryerson & Son v. Peden

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 30, 1924No. Gen. No. 28,774Published

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Taylor

Upon this appeal it is claimed that the chancellor erred in the allowance of certain interest, and also in decreeing that certain treasury stock held by one Albert Rentner, as trustee, should be treated as shares chargeable against the other stockholders.

The prior history of the litigation in this case is reported in 222 Ill. App. 150, and 303 Ill. 171, so it becomes unnecessary to set forth here the facts that are involved in detail.

In the opinion of the Supreme Court, certain pertinent facts are recited as follows:

“In April, 1913, a petition was filed in the United States district court to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sexton v. DreyfusSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Seegmiller v. DayCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1918
  3. In re Beachy & Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1909
  4. Joseph T. Ryerson & Son v. PedenIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Winston v. Dorsett Pipe & Paving Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1889

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API