Legal Opinion

Chamberlain v. Thames

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 29, 1998No. COA97-943Published

1Opinion of the Court

509 S.E.2d 443 (1998)

Constance A. CHAMBERLAIN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Troy Randall THAMES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. COA97-943.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

December 29, 1998.

Glenn, Mills & Fisher, P.A., by William S. Mills, Durham, for plaintiff-appellee.

Haywood, Denny & Miller, L.L.P., by John R. Kincaid and Thomas H. Moore, Durham, for defendant-appellant.

HORTON, Judge.

Defendant contends that the trial court erred in the admission of hearsay evidence by (I) allowing a medical expert to testify about the findings and opinions of a nontestifying medical expert; (II) allowing plaintiff to…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. In Re the Appeal From the Civil PenaltySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  2. Sims ex rel. Sims v. Charlotte Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. Sims v. Charlotte Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. Wiseman v. WisemanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  5. State v. AdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API