Legal Opinion

Douglass v. Adult & Family Services Division

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 31, 1983No. 2-2002-HW1461-1; CA A24308PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, P. J.

Petitioner, the prevailing party in Douglass v. Adult and Family Services Division, 61 Or App 298, 655 P2d 1103 (1983) (per curiam), seeks an award of an attorney fee pursuant to the Oregon Administrative Procedures Act (APA). We award an attorney fee of $1,500.

Our original decision arose on judicial review of a final order of the Adult and Family Services Division (AFSD) that determined that petitioner had received an overpayment of $5,057.06 in public assistance funds as the result of an agency error and that the agency was not estopped from seeking to collect the overpayment from…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Van Gordon v. Oregon State Board of Dental ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  2. Johnson v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  3. Burke v. Public Welfare DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  4. Goldhammer v. Adult & Family Services DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  5. State v. HoughtonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. White v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  2. Central Lincoln PUD v. Dept. of EnergyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API