Legal Opinion
Falica v. ADVANCE TENANT SERVICES, INC.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 8, 2005No. CIV.A. 02-2463(RBW)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WALTON, District Judge.
Currently before the Court is the plaintiffs’ Motion for Attorney’s Fees and Costs (“Pis.’ Mot.”) [D.E. # 45] and the defendants’ opposition to this motion. 1 Upon full consideration of the parties’ submissions, the Court concludes that the plaintiffs are entitled to reasonable attorney’s fees in the amount of $82,853.00 and expenses in the amount of $1,732.85.
I. Background
The plaintiffs, Lee Falica (“Falica”), Saba Gonzalez (“Gonzalez”), and Ernesto Lemus (“Lemus”), request that this Court award them attorney’s fees in an action they initiated to…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Larry Nadeau v. Raymond A. Helgemoe, Warden, New Hampshire State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
- Yourish v. California AmplifierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Dolores J. Copeland, Individually and on Behalf of the Class of All Others Similarly Situated v. F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Parker v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Muldrow v. Re-Direct, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Serrano v. Chicken-Out Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Craig v. Metropolitan Police DepartmentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- American Lands Alliance v. NARTONDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.