Legal Opinion

Reed v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 26, 1924No. 8521PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The offense is the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of two years.

The recognizance is defective. As contained in the record, it states that the appellant "stands charged with the offense of violating the prohibition law." This does not name any offense denounced in our Penal Code. The form of recognizance demanded by the Legislature expressly requires that the recognizance state the offense of which the accused has been convicted. Art. 903, C.C.P. The State's Attorney insists upon a dismissal of the appeal. The appellant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Westbrook v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  2. Singleton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
  3. Godby v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Perkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927
  2. Pierce v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
  3. Meyers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
  4. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API