Legal Opinion

Westbrook v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 26, 1921No. 5959PublishedCited by 15 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

The State has moved to dismiss this appeal for the want of a sufficient recognizance. The only recognizance appearing in the record is as follows: "This day came into open court Will Westbrook, defendant in the above entitled and numbered cause, who together with S.R. Harper, J.R. White and Toney White, Sureties, acknowledge themselves jointly and severally indebted to the State of Texas in the sum of Fifteen Hundred ($1500) conditioned that the said Will Westbrook who stands charged with the offense of a felony, to-wit — Unlawfully selling intoxicating liquors in this court, shall appear…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Privitt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1936
  2. Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  3. Wingate v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  4. Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  5. Daniel Everett Brooks v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2012

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API