Legal Opinion

Lichtman v. Mazzeo

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1947Published

1Opinion of the CourtBenvenga, J.

This is an action to compel the defendant specifically to perform a contract for the purchase and sale of real property. The note or memorandum of the contract is in the form of a receipt, the body of which' reads as follows: “ Deceived from Mr. GL Candido [the plaintiff’s assignor] the sum of $1,000 as a deposit on property located at 1818 Bath-gate Avenue. Sale price $5800. ’ ’

The question presented is whether the writing comes within the purview of section 259 of the Beal Property Law, which provides that a contract for the sale of real property is void, “ unless the contract, or some note…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ansorge v. KaneNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  2. N. E. D. Holding Co. v. McKinleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  3. Donald Friedman & Co. v. NewmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  4. Tobias v. LynchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
  5. Tobias v. . LynchNew York Court of Appeals · 1922

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API