Legal Opinion

Angelika Films, Inc. v. Urban Entertainment Associates, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1988PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Edward H. Lehner, J.

The question raised on this motion is whether property retained pursuant to the possessory liens provided in sections 180 and 188 of the Lien Law may be recovered, by one entitled to possession of the property, upon the filing of a surety bond. Under the facts herein, the court will permit movants to obtain possession of the property upon filing of an appropriate surety bond or the making of a cash deposit.

FACTS

Defendant Urban Entertainment Associates, Inc. (Urban) is *409the producer of a motion picture which plaintiff agreed to distribute. The film was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ukryn v. Morgan Marine Base, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. Reeder v. WarnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. Rudolf v. FC Marine Repair, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1983

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. LaChapelle v. TorresDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  2. People v. AyalaNew York Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Weener Plastics, Inc. v. HNH PACKAGING, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API