Legal Opinion

In re Effortless Office Enterprises Data Breach Litigation

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided August 18, 2026No. 2:25-cv-01123Unknown

1Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 * * * 4 Case No. 2:25-cv-01123-GMN-BNW 5 IN RE EFFORTLESS OFFICE ENTERPRISES DATA BREACH ORDER and REPORT AND 6 LITIGATION RECOMMENDATION 7 8 9 Before this Court is Defendant Nevada Heart & Vascular Center, LLP (“NHVC”)’s 10 motion to dismiss. ECF No. 46. Plaintiffs responded at ECF No. 48, and NHVC replied at ECF 11 No. 49. For the reasons discussed below, this Court recommends that NHVC’s motion to dismiss 12 be granted. 13 I. BACKGROUND 14 A. Facts and Procedural History 15 Plaintiffs bring this putative class action individually and on…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  5. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API