Legal Opinion

City & Cnty. of S.F. v. Post

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided April 11, 2018No. A149136PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Tucher, J.*

*238*124In 1998 the San Francisco Board of Supervisors outlawed discrimination against tenants who pay a portion of their rent with a Section 8, or similar, housing voucher. They did this by amending San Francisco's existing housing discrimination ordinance to outlaw discrimination based on a person's "source of income," a term they defined broadly to *125include government rent subsidies. (S.F. Police Code, § 3304, subd. (a).) The following year, the California Legislature also expanded the state's Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) to prohibit discrimination based on a tenant's…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Rojo v. KligerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Birkenfeld v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Sherwin-Williams Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. People v. AlvarezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Agnew v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. P. ex rel. Soto v. Group IX BP PropertiesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API