Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Andrews v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters Retirement & Relief Board

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 18, 2010No. 08-AA-1008Published

1ConcurrenceSchwelb, Senior Judge

This is a compelling case of considerable urgency. While I agree with most of the court’s opinion, I write separately to focus on the practical consequences of any unnecessary delay in disposing of Ms. Andrews’ claim. In this case, as much as or more than in any other case that I have confronted in over thirty years on the bench, justice delayed is likely to prove to be justice denied. If the parties cannot reach a reasonable settlement — by far the most constructive option available — then the Board should, in my view, move with the utmost expedition towards an immediate and just resolution…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re MeltonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Lasalle Extension University & Katharine Gibbs School (Inc.) v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  3. Hurwitz v. HurwitzCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
  4. Tyson v. TysonWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Farris v. ComptonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API