Stowell v. Action Moving & Storage, Inc.
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.
¶ 1. Plaintiff Arthur Stowell appeals the superior court’s order denying penalties and attorney’s fees under 21 V.S.A. § 347, claiming his employer, defendant Action Moving & Storage, Inc., improperly withheld commission payments in violation of § 342. We affirm the court’s order to the extent it held that commission payments are wages within the meaning of Vermont’s wages-and-medium-of-payment law. We reverse the court’s order, however, to the extent it held that defendant did not violate § 342 and plaintiff was not entitled to penalties under § 347. We hold that plaintiff is entitled to…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Schilling v. Radio Holdings, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
- Admiral Mortgage, Inc. v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- State v. O'NEILLSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
- Butler ex rel. Skidmore v. Hartford Technical Institute, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- In Re Margaret Susan P.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1999
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Stowell v. Action Moving & Storage, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2007