Legal Opinion

Stowell v. Action Moving & Storage, Inc.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided June 1, 2007No. 05-532PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.

¶ 1. Plaintiff Arthur Stowell appeals the superior court’s order denying penalties and attorney’s fees under 21 V.S.A. § 347, claiming his employer, defendant Action Moving & Storage, Inc., improperly withheld commission payments in violation of § 342. We affirm the court’s order to the extent it held that commission payments are wages within the meaning of Vermont’s wages-and-medium-of-payment law. We reverse the court’s order, however, to the extent it held that defendant did not violate § 342 and plaintiff was not entitled to penalties under § 347. We hold that plaintiff is entitled to…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Schilling v. Radio Holdings, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Admiral Mortgage, Inc. v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  3. State v. O'NEILLSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
  4. Butler ex rel. Skidmore v. Hartford Technical Institute, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  5. In Re Margaret Susan P.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1999

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Stowell v. Action Moving & Storage, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API