Legal Opinion
Beth E. Tesch v. General Motors Corporation, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Third-Party v. Wanda L. Brandt, Kenneth R. Brandt, Jr., and Michael Brandt, Third-Party
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided July 16, 1991No. 89-3750Published
1Opinion of the Court
937 F.2d 359
13 Employee Benefits Ca 2662
Beth E. TESCH, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, Defendant.
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant, Third-Party
Plaintiff/Appellant,
v.
Wanda L. BRANDT, Kenneth R.
Brandt, Jr., and Michael Brandt,
Third-Party Defendants/Appellees.
No. 89-3750.
United States Court of Appeals,
Seventh Circuit.
Argued Nov. 1, 1990.
Decided July 16, 1991.
Lawrence T. Lynch, George D. Cunningham, James O. Huber, Alexander T. Pendleton, Foley & Lardner, Milwaukee, Wis., and William J. Toppeta, and Allan M. Marcus, Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., New York City, for Gen.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Central Transport, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Charles W. Leigh and Ervin F. Dusek, Etc., and George Johnson, Intervening v. Clyde William EngleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Max I. Bittner v. Sadoff & Rudoy IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- 28 Fair empl.prac.cas. 19, 28 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 32,459 Alta Chrapliwy, and Cross-Appellees v. Uniroyal, Inc., a Corporation, and Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.