Legal Opinion
Eastman Kodak Co. v. Bayer Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 4, 2008No. 04 Civ. 05132(MGC)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CEDARBAUM, District Judge.
Plaintiff Martin Coyne moves for summary judgment on this claim for pension benefits pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(B), Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) § 502(a)(1)(B). An additional plaintiff, Eastman Kodak Co. (“Kodak”), sues for indemnification, but does not move for summary judgment at this time. Bayer Corp., the Sterling Drug Inc. Supplemental Benefit Plan, and the Supplemental Benefit Plan Committee of Sterling Drug Inc. (“Defendants”) move for summary judgment against both plaintiffs, seeking a determination that Coyne is not…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Anna Fay and Louis Fay v. Oxford Health Plan, Mount Sinai Medical Center Point-Of-Service-PlanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Topps Co., Inc. v. Cadbury Stani SAICCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Pens. Plan Guide P 23915h John L. Kemmerer James H. Jordan, in No. 95-1071 v. Ici Americas Inc. John L. Kemmerer James H. Jordan v. Ici Americas Inc., in No. 95-1098Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Douglas Dobson v. Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc., Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Perreca v. GluckCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. STWB Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. STWB Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- The Central Orthopedic Group, LLP v. Aetna Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2026