Legal Opinion

George K. Baum & Company v. Twin City Fire Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 25, 2014No. 12-3982, 12-3983PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RILEY, Chief Judge.

George K. Baum & Company (Baum) sold or underwrote various municipal bonds, representing the interest on the bonds was tax exempt. The IRS later determined the bonds were not tax exempt. Baum timely notified its insurer, Twin City Fire Insurance Company (Twin City), of the potential for related civil liability, and Twin City agreed the IRS investigation was a claim under the policy. Years later, several lawsuits (derivatives litigation) were filed, and Baum waited almost two years to notify Twin City.

Twin City initially disclaimed coverage on the theory that the derivatives…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Breed v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Riverside South Planning Corp. v. CRP/Extell Riverside, L.P.New York Court of Appeals · 2009

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Great West Casualty Co. v. National Casualty Co.District Court, D. North Dakota · 2014
  2. Food Market Merchandising, Inc v. Scottsdale Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
  3. Eb Holdings II, Inc. v. Illinois National Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
  4. Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance v. Kelly Stuart SchmidtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
  5. Honor v. SalvadorDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2023

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API