Legal Opinion

Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance v. Kelly Stuart Schmidt

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 11, 2015No. 14-2933PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BYE, Circuit Judge.

Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Company (Grinnell) appeals the district court’s 1 grant of summary judgment in favor of Jerome and Kelly Schmidt in this insurance coverage dispute. The district court determined a farm policy issued to the Schmidts provided coverage for an accident involving an all-terrain vehicle (ATV) which occurred on the Schmidts’ farm. We affirm.

I

Jerome and Kelly Schmidt, father and son, operate a farm together in Worthington, Minnesota. Kelly has a daughter named Madison. In May 2012, Madison hosted a sleepover party at her father’s and grandfather’s farm…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Bloomington Steel & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  2. Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. WoltersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  3. General Casualty Co. of Wisconsin v. Wozniak Travel, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  4. Jones v. FleischhackerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  5. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. RicksMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. 3M Co. v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of PittsburghCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
  2. Seifert v. IMT Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API