Legal Opinion

United States v. James J. Zammiello

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 22, 1970No. 24752_1PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from a conviction on two counts of violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2312, interstate transportation of a stolen motor vehicle. Appellant acted as his own counsel both at the trial 1 2 and on this appeal.

Appellant contends that he was improperly identified in court. The United States Attorney requested appellant to stand and he was identified by a Government witness. This was not error. Requiring a defendant to stand in court for the purpose of identification is not a violation of the Fifth Amendment. 2

Appellant claims error in receiving in evidence a check which the Government had…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stamphill v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943
  2. United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
  3. Benny Peoples v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. James Ray Thomas v. R.D. Brewer, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  2. United States v. WarrenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  3. United States v. Howard Jackson, Jr., United States of America v. Billy Joe Payne, United States of America v. Robert H. WillisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  4. United States v. Charles Emmett HoffmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  5. United States v. O'Neal WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API