Copperweld Steel Co. v. Demag-Mannesmann-Boehler
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM and ORDER
McCUNE, District Judge.
And now, February 20, 1973, following consideration of the arguments of counsel and briefs submitted on the motion for allowance of appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) from our previous orders which refused to enforce an alleged forum selection clause and refused to hold a hearing to determine whether the forum selection clause had actually been negotiated in good faith and would, if enforced, be unreasonable, we deny the motion that we grant defendants an appealable order. After further consideration we believe the alleged forum selection clause…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Copperweld Steel Co. v. Demag-Mannesmann-BoehlerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
- Copperweld Steel Co. v. Demag-Mannesmann-BoehlerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
3Cited by4 opinions
- Copperweld Steel Company, in No. 77-1493 v. Demag-Mannesmann-Bohler, Demag Stranggiess-Technik Gmbh, Demag Aktiengesellschaft, in No. 77-1494Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- Hoes of America, Inc. v. HoesDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 1979
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Travelers Indemnity Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1975
- Losson v. Union Des Associations Europeennes De FootballDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024