Legal Opinion

Cox v. . Brown

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 30, 1940PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Facts. The plaintiff, a resident of the city of Concord, during the fiscal year beginning 1 June, 1939, and expiring 31 May, 1940, owned and operated a passenger motor vehicle for hire, being commonly known as a "taxi." That the business of the plaintiff consisted in transporting passengers for compensation from place to place over the streets and highways within the city of Concord as well as from place to place outside the city of Concord. For the year 1939, and for the year 1940, the plaintiff's for-hire passenger vehicle was licensed by the State of North Carolina as such and the State of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Rodgers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Dahnke v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Keith v. . LockhartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  4. In Re Applicants for LicenseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  5. Kearney v. . VannSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Payne v. MasseyTexas Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Victory Cab Co. v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. State v. FurioSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. Duke Power Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  5. Southern Railway Co. v. City of Winston-SalemCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API