Legal Opinion

State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Martinez

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 5, 2008No. 1-06-1902PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hall

In the underlying action, Humbelina Flores and her husband Aurelio Flores sought insurance coverage for a personal injury action under a homeowners insurance policy that State Farm Fire & Casualty Company (State Farm) issued to Martin Torres and his wife Maria Torres. State Farm filed this declaratory judgment action contending that the Floreses are not covered under the Torreses’ homeowners policy because under the terms of the policy they do not qualify as insureds since they are not residents of the Torreses’ “household” as that term is defined in the case law. We agree.

The facts…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Travelers Insurance v. Eljer Manufacturing, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Abrams v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
  3. American States Ins. Co., Western Pac. Div. v. WalkerUtah Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Royal Insurance v. Process Design Associates, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  5. Erie Insurance Exchange v. StephensonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Standard Mutual Insurance Co. v. LayIllinois Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Heitmann v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Secura Supreme Insurance Company, Tim O'Brien, and Sandra O'Brien v. Diana JohnsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. West Bend Mutual Insurance Company v. DJW-Ridgeway Building Consultants, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2015
  5. Board of Education, Proviso Township High School District No. 209 v. JacksonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API