Legal Opinion

Seaver v. Commandant, U.S. Disciplinary Barracks

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided March 31, 1998No. 94-3509-RDRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ROGERS, Senior District Judge.

This action was filed pro se by petitioner, an inmate at the United States Disciplinary Barracks, Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, captioned as a “motion to reduce or correct sentence pursuant to Rule 35, Federal Rules Criminal Procedure.” Petitioner was permitted to proceed in forma pauperis and the pleading was liberally construed as a petition for writ of habeas corpus, 28 U.S.C. § 2241. An Order to Show Cause issued, respondents filed an Answer and Return, petitioner filed a Traverse and respondents filed a Response to the Traverse. In essence,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. McCarty v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Burns v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. United States v. OhrtUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  4. United States v. GorskiCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
  5. Jackson v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fernandez v. NickelsDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2000
  2. Loeh v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  3. Pearsall v. Tribal Council for the Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde Community of OregonGrand Ronde Tribal Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API