Nakahara v. NS 1991 American Trust
Court of Chancery of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHANDLER, Chancellor.
Plaintiffs are managing trustees of a Delaware business trust seeking advance indemnification from the trust under an advancement provision in the trust’s governing instrument. The trust agrees that plaintiffs are entitled to advancement. A beneficiary of the trust’s parent trust objects to the advancement on the- grounds that the Delaware Business Trust Act does not permit business trusts to advance litigation expenses to trustees and, even so, plaintiffs have not satisfied the pre-condi-tions set forth in the business trust’s advancement provision. I find that…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
- Moore v. SizemoreSupreme Court of Delaware · 1979
- Cede & Co. v. Technicolor, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1994
- Citadel Holding Corp. v. RovenSupreme Court of Delaware · 1992
- Graham v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Delaware · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Kaung v. Cole National Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2005
- ASARCO LLC v. Americas Mining Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2008
- Senior Tour Players v. GOLFTOWNCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2004
- Cargill, Inc. v. JWH Special Circumstance LLCCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2008
- Schoon v. Troy Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2008
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.