Legal Opinion

Kotkin v. Aronson

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 26, 2003PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

We affirm the judgment below, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 358 N.J.Super. 284, 815 A.2d 962 (2002). We add only these brief comments to amplify that opinion.

Plaintiffs and defendants are, respectively, intended buyers and sellers of a parcel of real estate, which includes a residential dwelling. The parties signed a form contract prepared by sellers’ real estate agent. The contract accords buyers the right to inspect the dwelling in respect of “heating, air conditioning, plumbing and electrical systems, foundation and structure,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kampf v. Franklin Life InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  2. In Re the Estate of MillerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  3. Kotkin v. AronsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Elliott & Frantz, Inc. v. Ingersoll-Rand Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
  2. Flanigan v. MunsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
  3. Morris Silverman Management Corp. v. Western Union Financial Services, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2003
  4. Aperion Enterprises Inc. v. Borough of Fair LawnNew Jersey Tax Court · 2009
  5. ST. GEORGE'S DRAGONS v. Newport Real Estate Group, LLCNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API