Legal Opinion

In re Hindsley

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 18, 1976No. Appeal, No. 802 C.D. 1975PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Blatt,

In Gismondi Liquor License Case, 199 Pa. Superior Ct. 619, 186 A.2d 448 (1962), our Superior Court held that persons living within a radius of five hundred feet of the proposed site of a new or transferred liquor license are entitled to appeal an adverse decision of the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board (Board) when such persons had protested the proposed site at hearings before the Board. See also White Oak Borough v. Kusic, 7 Pa. Commonwealth *123Ct. 280, 299 A.2d 56 (1973). When, in the case at hand, however, the Board decided on January 20,1975 to permit Joseph M. and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Saracina v. CotoiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. Wright v. Eureka Tempered Copper Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  3. Gismondi Liquor License CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  4. White Oak Borough v. KusicCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Bloom v. B'Nai Emanual, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hindsley Liquor License CaseCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. In re Family Style Restaurant, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API