Legal Opinion
Hammett v. Sherman
District Court, S.D. California
Decided September 30, 2022No. 3:19-cv-00605Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LAURA LYNN HAMMETT, Case No.: 19cv605-LL-AHG 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR 13 v. RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEYS’ FEES 14 MARY E. SHERMAN, et al. AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S 15 Defendants. REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION 16 [ECF Nos. 177, 193] 17 18 19 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Laura Lynn Hammett’s Motion to Vacate 20 Void Orders Granting Attorneys’ Fees. ECF No. 177. The Motion requests that the Court 21 vacate or reconsider its March 23, 2020 order [ECF No. 111] granting the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Julie Chalmers v. City of Los Angeles, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- City Of Los Angeles, Harbor Division, A Municipal Corporation, Petitioner-Appellant v. Santa Monica BaykeeperCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- R.E. Rodgers and Barbara Rodgers v. James G. Watt, Secretary of the Interior of the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Walter D. Balla v. Idaho State Board of Corrections, Walter D. Balla v. Idaho State Board of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- John Staren and David Henner v. American National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.