Legal Opinion
Coakley Landfill Group v. IT Corp.
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided February 18, 2000No. Civ. 98-167-JMPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MUIRHEAD, United States Magistrate Judge.
In the above-captioned diversity action, the Coakley Landfill Group alleges that defendant IT Corporation breached its contract to provide environmental remediation of the Coakley Landfill and violated New Hampshire Revised Statutes Annotated (RSA) 358-A. IT subsequently filed a third-party complaint against members of the Coakley Group alleging breach of contract, wrongful termination, and violation of RSA 358-A. Currently before the court is IT’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment to which the Coakley Group objects. For the reasons that follow,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Samuel Mesnick v. General Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Gerald Griggs-Ryan v. Beulah Smith, Gerald Griggs-Ryan v. Richard ConnellyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Casillas-Guardiola v. Bayer Puerto Rico, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2025
- Coakley Landfill Group v. IT Corp.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2000
- Power v. Connectweb Technologies, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2024
- South River Capital, LLC v. Manufacturers & Traders Trust CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2025