Legal Opinion

MILLER v. DOYLE & HOEFS LLC

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 7, 2024No. 2:23-cv-04924Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DIONDRA MILLER, : Plaintiff, : : v. : CIVIL ACTION NO. 23-CV-4924 : DOYLE & HOEFS LLC, et al., : Defendants. : MEMORANDUM KENNEY, J. FEBRUARY 7, 2024 Plaintiff Diondra Miller initiated this civil action by filing a pro se Complaint against Doyle & Hoefs LLC (“D&H”) and Amy F. Doyle, Esquire, raising claims under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”),

15 U.S.C. §§ 1692

-1692p. Miller seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis. For the following reasons, the Court will grant Miller leave to proceed in forma…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Kelley Mala v. Crown Bay MarinaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
  3. Miguel Perez v. James FenoglioCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
  4. DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. CunoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Steven Vogt v. John WetzelCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API