Legal Opinion

Kinkead v. Turgeon

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1905No. 13,904PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error to the district court for Dakota county: Guy T. Graves, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Oldham, C.

This was a suit in ejectment, which was tried to the court and a jury on the following stipulation of facts: “It is hereby stipulated by and between the parties hereto: That the plaintiff is, and in 187G was, the owner of so much of the land described in his petition as was above the line of ordinary high water mark of the Missouri river in May, 1876; that in May, 1876, the. Missouri, river, which *574is a navigable state boundary river, suddenly abandoned its permanent channeladjacent to plaintiff’s said land, leaving its former channel and forming a new channel by suddenly cutting…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Hardin v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Barney v. KeokukSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  4. Jefferis v. East Omaha Land Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
  5. Nebraska v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1892

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Ellis v. GerbingSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
  2. State v. KorrerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  3. United States v. WilsonDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1977
  4. Nebraska v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Omaha Indian Tribe v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API