Legal Opinion

People v. Standard Oil Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1933No. Docket No. S.F. 14739PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This action is by the People of the State of California to recover from defendant a balance due for excise taxes imposed by the Act of 1923 (Stats. 1923, p. 571, chap. 267), as amended by the Statutes of 1927, pages 1309 (chap. 716) and 1565 (chap. 795), based upon sales of gasoline to and deliveries at the army post exchange located on the Presidio military reservation at San Francisco. The defendant had judgment in the court below and plaintiff prosecutes this appeal.

The case arises upon an agreed statement of facts, which show that beginning about July 1, 1929, and ending…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Panhandle Oil Co. v. Mississippi Ex Rel. KnoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Surplus Trading Co. v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Eastern Air Transport, Inc. v. South Carolina Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Concessions Co. v. MorrisWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  5. People v. MouseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Co. of Cal. v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Slattery v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
  3. Daniels v. Chanute Air Force Base ExchangeDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1955
  4. Pacific Coast Dairy, Inc. v. Department of AgricultureCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Standard Oil Co. v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API