Legal Opinion

Edmund Wright-Ginsberg v. Carlisle Rib. Mills

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided December 17, 1929PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Complainant, by its bill, seeks (a) to compel defendant Carlisle Ribbon Mills to transfer to complainant's name upon said defendant's books two hundred and fifty shares of its common capital stock, represented by its certificate bearing number 3, and (b) to enjoin the transfer of certificate bearing number 4 issued by said defendant and to compel defendants Fred A. and Ralph J. Baer to surrender and deliver up for cancellation said last-mentioned certificate.

The facts pertinent to the present inquiry, as they appear from the evidence adduced, are these: On January 15th, 1920, the defendant…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Knight, Exr. v. ShutzOhio Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Murtland Holding Co. v. Egg Harbor, C., BankNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1938
  3. State Ex Rel. North American Co. v. KoernerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1948
  4. First Nat. Bank, Fort Lee v. EnglewoodNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1938
  5. First Nat. Bank of Fairbanks v. Alaska Airmotive, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API