Legal Opinion

Hertz Corp. v. DAHILL MOVING & STORAGE CO., INC.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 16, 1981PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

On summary consideration, order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with costs. The claim of third-party defendant North River Ins. Co. that it was not apprised of the pendency of a motion for summary judgment against it is without merit. Having moved for summary judgment against the defendant and third-party plaintiff, Dahill Moving and Storage Co., Inc., North River exposed itself to an award of summary judgment in favor of Dahill. Moreover, North River was apprised of a motion by third-party defendant, W. M. Ross and Co., Inc., for summary judgment declaring that North…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Dairylea Cooperative, Inc. v. RossalNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Morris v. Snappy Car Rental, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. ELRAC, Inc. v. RudelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  4. Denton Leasing Corp. v. Breezy Point Surf Club, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  5. Caldararo v. AuDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API