Hertz Corp. v. DAHILL MOVING & STORAGE CO., INC.
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
On summary consideration, order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with costs. The claim of third-party defendant North River Ins. Co. that it was not apprised of the pendency of a motion for summary judgment against it is without merit. Having moved for summary judgment against the defendant and third-party plaintiff, Dahill Moving and Storage Co., Inc., North River exposed itself to an award of summary judgment in favor of Dahill. Moreover, North River was apprised of a motion by third-party defendant, W. M. Ross and Co., Inc., for summary judgment declaring that North…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Dairylea Cooperative, Inc. v. RossalNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Morris v. Snappy Car Rental, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- ELRAC, Inc. v. RudelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Denton Leasing Corp. v. Breezy Point Surf Club, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Caldararo v. AuDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.