Town of Andover v. Energy Facilities Siting Board
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtSpina, J.
The Energy Facilities Siting Board (board) approved the petition of Nickel Hill Energy, LLC, to construct and operate a 750-megawatt natural gas-fired, combined cycle electrical generating facility on a twenty-five acre site in the town of Dracut. The town of Andover and Merrimack Valley Residents for the Environment, Inc., interveners in the administrative proceedings below,3 appealed from the decision of the board to a single justice of this court, pursuant to G. L. c. 25, § 5, and G. L. c. 164, § 69R The single justice reserved and reported the case to the full court.
On appeal the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Save the Bay, Inc. v. Department of Public UtilitiesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Enos v. Secretary of Environmental AffairsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
- Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Electric Co. v. Energy Facilities Siting CouncilMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Zachs v. Department of Public UtilitiesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
- Point of Pines Beach Ass'n v. Energy Facilities Siting BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
3Cited by10 opinions
- Providence & Worcester Railroad v. Energy Facilities Siting BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
- Alliance to Protect Nantucket Sound, Inc. v. Energy Facilities Siting BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
- Alliance to Protect Nantucket Sound, Inc. v. Energy Facilities Siting BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
- City Council of Agawam v. Energy Facilities Siting BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
- Board of Health of Sturbridge v. Board of Health of SouthbridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.