Legal Opinion

State v. Bell

Clermont County Court of Common Pleas

Decided January 29, 2008No. 2006 CR 00867PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RinglaND, Judge.

{¶ 1} Defendant, Jaysen W. Bell, has filed several motions in limine seeking anticipatory rulings on evidentiary matters. Specifically, defendant requests the exclusion of a recorded telephone conversation between himself and a complaining witness, pornographic images allegedly found on computer hard drives seized from his home, and evidence of e-mails and online chats between himself and an alleged victim. He also requests an evidentiary hearing at which to address the scientific reliability of polygraph examinations in an effort to admit the results of *59two favorable…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  2. State v. BarnettOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. State v. Mills, 2007 Ap 07 0039 (4-15-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. In Re J. F., 24490 (4-22-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API