Legal Opinion

Sappenfield v. National Zinc Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 9, 1915No. 19,171PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Wyandotte district court, division No. 3; Hugh J. Smith, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mason, J.:

Daniel G. Sappenfield recovered a judgment against the National Zinc Company for injuries received while in its employ, and it appeals. It was a part of the plaintiff’s duty to attend to a furnace twelve feet long, seven feet wide and twelve to fifteen feet high, in the top of which were several openings a foot and a half square, ordinarily closed with iron covers, but opened for the purpose of feeding coal and slack. As the coal burned a crust would form, and before fresh fuel was introduced it was necessary to break this up by prodding it…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Anders v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1914

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Starkweather v. DunlapSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  2. Phillips v. Commercial National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  3. Rider v. HelmsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API