Sappenfield v. National Zinc Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from Wyandotte district court, division No. 3; Hugh J. Smith, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Mason, J.:
Daniel G. Sappenfield recovered a judgment against the National Zinc Company for injuries received while in its employ, and it appeals. It was a part of the plaintiff’s duty to attend to a furnace twelve feet long, seven feet wide and twelve to fifteen feet high, in the top of which were several openings a foot and a half square, ordinarily closed with iron covers, but opened for the purpose of feeding coal and slack. As the coal burned a crust would form, and before fresh fuel was introduced it was necessary to break this up by prodding it…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Anders v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1914
3Cited by3 opinions
- Starkweather v. DunlapSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
- Phillips v. Commercial National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
- Rider v. HelmsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915