Legal Opinion
Scioto Trails Co. v. Ohio Department of Liquor Control
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided June 30, 1983No. 82AP-961PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWhiteside, P.J.
Plaintiffs, Scioto Trails Company et al., appeal from a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas and raise three assignments of error, as follows:
“I. The trial court erred in holding that a liquor license is not a property interest.
“II. The trial court erred in holding that a liquor license is not a protected right under the due process clause or equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution or the Ohio Constitution.
“HI. The trial court erred in dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint.”
Plaintiffs purchased the Scioto Trails Tavern located at 4490 Riverside…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People v. McBrideIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
- Glicker v. Michigan Liquor Control CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1947
- National Contracting Co. v. Hudson River Water Power Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1908
- Canton v. Imperial Bowling Lanes, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1968
- State Ex Rel. Zugravu v. O'BrienOhio Supreme Court · 1935
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Brookpark Entertainment, Inc. v. TaftCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- BPNC, Inc. v. TaftCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Rickard v. Ohio Department of Liquor ControlOhio Court of Appeals · 1986
- Brookpark Entertainment, Inc. v. BrownDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1990
- Brookpark Entertainment, Inc. v. TaftCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.