Legal Opinion
BPNC, Inc. v. Taft
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided August 16, 2005No. 04-3713UnpublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN CORBETT OMEARA, District Judge.
Plaintiffs-Appellants BPNC, Inc., Brian Pearson and Nicolas Costanzo (collectively “Plaintiffs”) appeal the district court’s orders granting Defendant-Appellee Hope Taft’s (“Taft”) motion to dismiss and Defendants-Appellees Rae Ann Estep, Pam Laycock, Rodney Isaacson, and Earl Mack’s (collectively “State Defendants”) motion for judgment on the pleadings. For the reasons set forth below, we will affirm the orders of the district court.
BACKGROUND FACTS
In 1998 plaintiffs Brian Pearson and Nicolas Costanzo developed the idea of selling a product consisting of…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Holzemer v. City of MemphisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- Phillips v. County of OrangeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Ghaster v. City of Rocky RiverDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2012
- VINEYARD INV., LLC v. City of Madison, Miss.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2010
- Desalegn Sisay v. Ricky SmithCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.