Legal Opinion

Montes v. Gibbens

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 29, 1999No. B124363Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MALLANO, J. *

This matter presents the novel issue of whether Civil Code section 3333.4, 1 enacted by the voters as part of Proposition 213, prohibits recovery by an employee of noneconomic damages for injuries he received while driving his employer’s uninsured motor vehicle. Plaintiff and appellant Louis Montes (appellant) appeals from a judgment in his favor against defendant and respondent (respondent) Thomas Gibbens. Appellant contends that the trial court erred in ruling that Civil Code section 3333.4 applied to his case, thus denying him $69,411.07 in noneconomic damages.

Factual…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Ward v. TaggartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Yoshioka v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  4. Quackenbush v. Superior Court of S.F.California Court of Appeal · 1997
  5. Honsickle v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API