Legal Opinion

Hendee v. Putnam Township

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 2010No. Docket 137446 and 137447Published

1Opinion of the Court

786 N.W.2d 521 (2010)

486 Mich. 556

Jeffrey HENDEE, Michael Hendee, Louann Demorest Hendee, and Village Pointe Development LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

PUTNAM TOWNSHIP, Defendant-Appellant.

Docket Nos. 137446, 137447. Calendar No. 2.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Argued November 3, 2009.

Decided July 15, 2010.

Myers & Myers, PLLC (by Roger L. Myers), Howell, for plaintiffs.

Foster, Swift, Collins & Smith, P.C. (by Thomas R. Meagher), Lansing, for defendant.

McClelland & Anderson, LLP (by David E. Pierson), Lansing, Honigman Miller Schwartz & Cohn LLP (by Norman Hyman), and Berry Reynolds & Rogowski PC (by…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Schlesinger v. Reservists Committee to Stop the WarSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Lingle v. Chevron U. S. A. Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API