Franklyn v. Taylor Hydraulic Air Compressing Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On certiorari to tbe Camden county Circuit Court, bringing up an order refusing to quasb a writ of attachment. The motion to quash was heard in the Circuit Court before his Honor James H. Nixon, a judge of said court, who decided the same in an opinion, in substance as follows: “This is a motion to quash an attachment, the defendant’s appearance having been entered ‘for the purpose of moving to quash the attachment entered in the above-stated cause.’ “The first question is…
Read the full summary
On certiorari to tbe Camden county Circuit Court, bringing up an order refusing to quasb a writ of attachment. The motion to quash was heard in the Circuit Court before his Honor James H. Nixon, a judge of said court, who decided the same in an opinion, in substance as follows: “This is a motion to quash an attachment, the defendant’s appearance having been entered ‘for the purpose of moving to quash the attachment entered in the above-stated cause.’ “The first question is whether the entry of such an appearance is equivalent to a general appearance. “After a general appearance, a motion to…
1Per curiam
The order of the Circuit Court in this case is affirmed, for the. reasons given by the learned Circuit Court judge, the substance of whose opinion we have placed at the head of this memorandum.
The defendant is entitled to costs.
2Cited by3 opinions
- Paul H. Aschkar & Company v. The Honorable Jesse W. CurtisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Pan American Securities Corp. v. Fried, Krupp Aktiengesell-SchaftHudson County Circuit Court, N.J. · 1938
- Dexter v. LichliterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1904