Thomas v. Marshall
District Court, S.D. Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
HAND, District Judge.
This case involves a claim for pension benefits beyond those which the trustees have tendered to the plaintiff. The trustees, in the answer, deny that any amount is owing except that which has been tendered to the plaintiff and ask for a declaratory judgment to that effect. After taking evidence during a short, non-jury trial, after hearing argument from counsel, after considering their briefs, and after considering the applicable law the Court makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law. Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a).
I.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Eaves v. PennCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
- Continental Casualty Company and Employers Surplus Lines Insurance Company v. Canadian Universal Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Fase v. Seafarers Welfare And Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Huge v. Maximeadows Mining Co.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1978
- Hurn v. RETIREMENT FUND TRUST, ETC.District Court, C.D. California · 1978
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gene Rettig v. Pension Benefit Guaranty CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Stephens v. US Airways GroupDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Rosenbaum v. Davis Iron Works, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1987
- Watts v. Wikoff Color Corp. of SCDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1981