Legal Opinion

Sheehan v. Andrew Cone General Advertising Agency, Inc.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 30, 1941PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShientag, J.

The plaintiff sued the defendant, his employer, to recover a sum representing the balance of commissions allegedly earned by him pursuant to an express contract of employment. The complaint and the moving affidavit state that by the terms of this contract the defendant agreed that after January 1, 1939, the defendant was to pay the plaintiff commissions at the rate of seven and one-half per cent on advertising contracts obtained by *883the plaintiff, and that the plaintiff was released from any obligation to repay the defendant for any overdrafts drawn by the plaintiff on the defendant prior to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Appelbaum v. GrossNew York Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Apfelbaum v. GrossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  3. Nathan Lyons, Inc. v. Sam S. & Lee Shubert, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Stukas v. StreiterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. Fleder v. ItkinNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
  3. Tractor & Equipment Corp. v. Chain Belt Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1942
  4. Scher v. AptAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  5. Wohl v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API