Legal Opinion
Appelbaum v. Gross
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 15, 1921PublishedCited by 13 opinions
Motion for partial judgment under rule 114, Rules of Civil Practice.
1Opinion of the CourtKapper, J.
This motion is made under rule. 114 of the Buies of Civil Practice for final judgment for a *141part of an entire claim alleged to ¡be admitted. The action is brought to recover the sum of $152,035.92 alleged to be the share of the profits in defendants’ business to which the plaintiff is entitled under contracts of employment covering the period from February 1, 1910, to February 1, 1921. These contracts are three in number and each is the subject matter of a separate cause of action set forth in the complaint. The first agreement is dated February 1, 1910, and, as subsequently modified by…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Galveston Dry Dock & Construction Co. v. Standard Dredging Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- Williams v. Edward DeV. Tompkins, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
- Fleder v. ItkinNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
- Apfelbaum v. GrossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- Continental Securities Co. v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.New York Supreme Court · 1922
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.