State v. Montgomery
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Judge.
The defendant contends that the trial court erred in beginning and proceeding with his trial in his absence. We conclude that the trial had begun when defendant voluntarily left, and that in so doing he waived his right to be present.
In every criminal prosecution it is the right of the accused to be present throughout the trial. In misdemeanor cases this right can be waived by defendant through his counsel. In felony cases other than capital ones the right to be present can be waived only by the party himself. In capital cases this right cannot be waived, and it is the duty of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- United States v. James Earl Young, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Pratt v. BishopSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- State v. McFaddenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. WhittedCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- State v. RichardsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- State v. SkipperCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- State v. PottsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- State v. SampleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.