Legal Opinion

Winston & Strawn LLP v. Crumens Ltd C/O Johnson & McLean LLC

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided October 24, 2018No. Civil Action No. 2013-0524Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) WINSTON & STRAWN LLP, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 13-524 (EGS) ) JAMES P. MCLEAN, JR, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION I. Introduction Plaintiff Winston & Strawn LLP (“W&S”) sues defendants Crumens Ltd. (“Crumens”) and James P. McLean, Jr. (“Mr. McLean”), proceeding pro se, for breach of contract. W&S, a law firm with an office in the District of Columbia, argues that it provided legal services pursuant to a contract and Mr. McLean refuses to pay. Pending before the Court is W&S’s motion for summary…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. United States v. James C. DunkelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  5. Waterhouse v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API