Legal Opinion

United States v. Stanley Warford, Robert Ellison, and Ina Ellison, Gerald L. Rainwaters and Cecil R. Howell

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided July 9, 1986No. 85-5576Published

1Opinion of the Court

791 F.2d 1519

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Stanley WARFORD, Robert Ellison, and Ina Ellison, Defendants,

Gerald L. Rainwaters and Cecil R. Howell, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 85-5576.

United States Court of Appeals,

Eleventh Circuit.

June 24, 1986.

As amended July 9, 1986.

Theodore L. Tripp, Jr., Moorey, Garvin & Tripp, P.A., Ft. Myers, Fla., for defendants-appellants.

B.B. Allen and Elizabeth Ruf Stein, Asst. U.S. Attys., Miami, Fla., for plaintiff-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida.

Before FAY and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges, and…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  2. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Mills v. DuryeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1813
  4. United States v. BrosnanSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. United States v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API